Thread:Chaoticcylinder/@comment-2A02:C7D:1A85:F600:A808:1949:651C:C4E0-20200728185356/@comment-2A02:C7D:1A85:F600:D5C7:A6D7:73BC:3080-20200729183233

2. Ok,  I  think  I  maybe  understand  now-  so  trans  people  don't  associate  at  all  with  their  sex,  as  in  don't  consider it  as  a  part  of  themselves  alongside  their  gender? Sorry,  I'd  always  thought  they'd  still  use  their  sex  to  define  their  sexual  orientation  but  I  think  I  understand  now.

3. I  mean  I'm  not  attracted  to  personalities  directly,  i  was  trying  to  make  the  point  that  I'm  not  interested  in people  because  they're  AFAB,  it's  not  a  fetish. As  for  femininity,  I'm  not  attracted  to  it.

I  don't  want  to  romantically/sexually  interact  with  people  who  were  born  with  a  male  body... I  don't  generally  like the  combination  of  secondary  sex  characteristics  that  AMABs  have,  and  I  don't  like  their  geniltalia  either. And  I've never  been  attracted  to  an  AMAB,  at  least  as  far  as  I'm  aware.

4. I  know  that  people  aren't  being  forced  to  date  anybody. I  had  never  really  considered  that,  that's  interesting. But  to  me  she  would  still  be  AMAB  and  I  can't  get  over  that  somehow. My  brain  is  really  stuck  on  this  and  I don't  know  why.

5. Sorry,  I'd  always  heard  it  as  being  both  sexes  because  I'm  used  to  sexual orientation  being  defined  by  sex.

6. Would  the  idea  of  a  sexuality  for  afabs  who  are  only  attracted  to  other  afabs  still  be  a  bad  idea  if  it  didn't include  trans  men  (so  now  just  cis  women  and  AFAB  nb  people)? And  is  it  inherently  bad  because  it's  based  on  sex rather  than  gender?

Finally,  is  there  a  form  of  bisexuality  (like  pan,  poly  etc)  for  people  who  are  only  attracted  to  cis  women, trans  men  and  AFAB  nb  people,  and  if  not  is  that  also  a  bad  idea?