User blog comment:Osteophage/Contradictory Information on SAM Page/@comment-36040512-20200223012154

Thank you for bringing that to my attantion. I don't know where the 2005 date came from. Prehaps a typo? I have fixed it to say 2015.

As for the other revisions, I don't think this is the appropriate place to present this information.

1) The information is far to complex and high level for what is supposed to be an intro level article. Even I have a hard time trying to follow the arguement you're trying to make, and I'd say I'm pretty knowledgeable on a-spec topics.

2) The information presented is highly bias, subjective, and dives far too deep into discourse. You claim that the split attraction model comes from a fundimental misunderstanding, yet it is impossible to tell exactly what the creators were thinking when creating the SAM. The SAM may not work for some people, but for other it may perfectly describe their experience.

3) You seem adamant that the SAM is inherently bad and should not be used, yet that is just not the case. It is true that the SAM does not work to describe all a-spec people's expirences. And it is true that people should not assume that all a-specs use the SAM (hence why I've also added a paragraph on this topic in the page). However, this does not mean the SAM is in-and-of-itself flawed. For the people it does work for it allows them to describe their orientantion in a way that they couldn't have otherwise.

This article is not suppose to be a discourse post about why the SAM shouldn't be used. It's an informative article that explains the basics of the SAM to people who think that it could be applied to their identitiy.