User blog comment:Osteophage/Contradictory Information on SAM Page/@comment-36040512-20200223012154/@comment-40174871-20200223032839

Thanks. Unfortunately I'd still say this still needs heavy editing -- for instance, "It wasn't until 2015 that the modern form of the SAM was created" leaves it unclear what's meant here by "the modern form of the SAM," which also needs citations.

1) I can invite the help of some beta readers, if you like. I know a few folks who might be willing to look the material over for us and give feedback. Which aspects do you consider too complex, and what are your criteria?

2) Yes, that's correct, the origins of the term "split attraction model" involve a lot of bias and incomplete or unfounded arguments. I'd like to report on that faithfully to the story of what happened. Unfortunately a lot of that source material has been lost due to post deletions/account deactivation/etc., but enough still remains to draw some conclusions. If the references and sources are added for the origin of the term, what would you consider an approrpiate summary?

3) Let me point out something you might have overlooked. I'm drawing a distinction between A) "split attraction model" (as a term, as in, that specific string of words) and B) the assortment of various different things that people have used that term to refer to. You don't appear to be making the same distinction. Do you know why I am?