Next Lesbian page that's made is getting renamed to Monosexual Lesbian and locked. Thoughts?
Next Lesbian page that's made is getting renamed to Monosexual Lesbian and locked. Thoughts?
I love that so much!!! Leaving out all the crappy exclusive stuff, I like the idea!
-Charlie
Isn't there already an identity for that?
There is but they're not gonna be happy being called anything but Lesbian which I think is valid. They're Lesbians if they say they're Lesbians. @TheAshSystem
Nvm, didn't look hard enough heh-
-Ranboo
I love that idea, that'll make everyone happy hopefully
I think thats a fine idea personally
TW: Exorsexism
No if its supposed to be a remedy for redefining lesbian from 'non-man x non-nam' (the definition most universally used), because implying this is 'monosexual' excludes nonbinary lesbians.
Also, please remove the bit about Faunic on the main page, it's insulting to imply that the definition we've been using for years is actually 'belongs' to an obscure lable from 2019
The non-man definition is not 'exorsexist', and saying 'Faunic' is allowed to use it but lesbian can't is hypocritical and Lesbiophobic. Saying men cannot be lesbians does not put men into a binary (not sure what you even mean by this).
Non man x non man? I didn't know we were shipping identities now.
TW: Exorsexism
Also "non-man loving non-man" assigns a binary to nonbinary people and assumes that no nonbinary people ever identify as man or are masc aligned. It is indeed exorsexist. Listen to Nonbinary people telling you to stop and to just use wlw/nblw.
No it doesn't lol.
What do you think?