Next Lesbian page that's made is getting renamed to Monosexual Lesbian and locked. Thoughts?
Next Lesbian page that's made is getting renamed to Monosexual Lesbian and locked. Thoughts?
Non man x non man? I didn't know we were shipping identities now.
TW: Exorsexism
Also "non-man loving non-man" assigns a binary to nonbinary people and assumes that no nonbinary people ever identify as man or are masc aligned. It is indeed exorsexist. Listen to Nonbinary people telling you to stop and to just use wlw/nblw.
No it doesn't lol.
Non-binary/neutral-alinged here, and it does. /srs
-Sapnap
TW: Exorsexism
This definition does not imply or assume that non-binary people cannot be men or masc-aligned.
The fact is many non-binary people do not identify as men so allowing these people to call themselves 'non-men' is not putting nonbinary people in general into a binary. I myself am nonbinary and disagree entirely with this assertion.
If someone doesn't consider themselves a 'non-man' this is totally fine but doesn't make this definition discrimination (by the definition of exorsexism written in this very wikia).
Anything else you'd like to say?
TW: Misgendering
Multiple nonbinary people here, including ourselves, a system comprised of multiple nonbinary headmates are telling you that calling us non-men is misgendering. What's not clicking?
Wlw/Nblw/nblnb works just just fine without assuming anyone's gender.
My opinion but "non-men" has always been exclusive term to me, like it sounds like you all are excluding male-alinged and trans men in this case where trans men with connection to womenhood. /srs /g
-Sapnap
If you don't Id with that term it's totally fine, but doesn't make non-man problematic or mean that I shouldn't use it for myself and others who identify with it.
I wasn't even talking about you fam.
What do you think?